You are invited to evaluate whether Vtraining’s simulated patients and training workflow are suitable for professional education — not whether the product is ready for unsupervised public launch.
Study purpose
Independent psychiatrists and psychologists assess clinical believability, educational usefulness, safety-relevant behaviors, and bilingual authenticity. Your judgment informs whether Professional Preview advances toward broader educational use.
Believability of the patient as a clinical encounter
End the session; note formative scores if you have admin access (therapists do not see full reports by design).
Repeat with another presentation or run an Arabic exchange if comfortable.
Optional: try voice mode for 3–5 turns to judge speech quality and latency.
Competency scores are formative training signals — not validated certification metrics. AI patients are fictional; do not enter real PHI. Experimental excellence modules (CQI, EOI, and related stacks) are outside this preview.
Consent & professional stance
Before you begin, please confirm you understand the conditions of this invited evaluation.
I am evaluating a training simulation with fictional standardized patients, not real clients.
I will not enter protected health information or identifiable details about living patients.
I understand scores and reports are formative educational signals, not validated high-stakes credentials.
I will treat unsafe presentations as simulation observations and report inadequate safety handling in feedback — not escalate with real crisis protocols for the avatar.
I will submit structured feedback to the Release Manager channel named in my invitation and will not post PHI.
Access
Enter the invitation code from your invite email, or sign in / create an account with the credentials provided by the Release Manager.